What If I Don’t Like Beans?

Bean Soup Theory, whataboutism, and anti-intellectualism on TikTok

Rhetorical analysis · 2025

Status
Completed paper
Body of work
Essays & public writing
Public format
Authored synopsis
“If it does not apply to me, it should; and if it should not, then it does not matter” is not merely an annoying comment pattern—it is a cultural logic that undermines collective knowledge-building.

This paper examines “Bean Soup Theory,” named for the social-media response to a recipe intended for an iron-deficient audience: “What if I don’t like beans?” It uses cultural rhetoric to trace a progression from individualized algorithmic response, to whataboutism as conversational derailment, to anti-intellectualism as a broader refusal to value knowledge that is not personally applicable.

Algorithmic platforms routinely place people before content not intended for them. Instead of moving past it, users are rewarded for recentering themselves, generating engagement through lateral comparison and critique.

  • Names a platform-specific version of whataboutism.
  • Connects algorithmic engagement incentives to individualism and echo-chamber formation.
  • Shows how small acts of conversational recentering scale into hostility toward expertise and shared knowledge.
  • Applies cultural-rhetorical analysis to ordinary digital behavior.
  • Completed as an academic rhetorical-methods paper.
TikTokrhetoricanti-intellectualismalgorithms

Continue the conversation

If this is the problem you are working on, we should probably talk.

I work with people and institutions wrestling with public systems, relational power, civic infrastructure, implementation, and the practical work of making care operational.

Start a conversation

Speaking · collaboration · consulting · research · institutional work